and i must say, i can agree with what people say about the "camera work" and it coulda been less lame if it had been a little more about the monster and wtf is with those little things.
but what does the word "cloverfield" have to do with anything..? obviously its the monster, but why is i called that, any idea?
anyway, if you understand what they were trying to do with it, its a pretty decent movie (though definitely overhyped)
-----
anyway, i suppose i liked it. it definitely follows the rule of "if you get split up, someone will die in the next couple minutes." i love predictability. seriously helicopters. and when they were going down the stairs with the camera light on, total "28 weeks later" flashback. only the camera persons not an idiot in this case ("im keeping the light on you guys, so i can see you, just keep walking forward.. walking forward..." "AHHH OH GOD I STEPPED IN SOMETHING" *rage*)
i think ill end up renting it though. i cant stand this i-cant-quite-see-whats-going-on-because-jpeg-artifacts-make-it-look-shitty. i like to see my movies.
No comments:
Post a Comment